Office
of the Zoning Administrator
Courthouse
608-647-2447
www.co.richland.wi.us/departments/zoning
September 3, 2009
Item # 1 The board meeting was called to order by Chairman Sebranek
at 1:00pm. Those present or who signed up to speak were Tina Marshall, Kelly
Pauls, Randy Heims, Tom McGlynn, Gilly Moe, Allen Rippchen, Dennis Dosch, Sandy
Schmelzer, Alex Christianson,
Item #2 Motion by Moe, seconded by Heims, to approve the publication and agenda. Motion carried.
Item #3 Motion by Rippchien, seconded by McGlynn to approve the August 6, 2009 meeting minutes. Motion carried.
Start of Public Hearing 1:01.
Item # 4 The board heard a petition from Brook Pauls to request a variance to the requirement of one seconday accessory structure in the Residential-2 zoning district to two secondary accessory structure in Section 32 of Buena Vista Township.
Discussion: Mr. Pauls’ mother sold her property where the proposed structure is and they want to move it to their property. Sandy Schmelzer, a neighbor, asked if the building will be seen from their property. Kelly Pauls told them that they would not so Schmelzer stated she was not opposed. Kelly Pauls brought in the township letter with her and stated the township reviewed the petition and approved their request on August 13, 2009. The structure in question is 40 x 35. Pedley inquired about the unique property limitation as being “none” on the form that was turned in. She stated that there actually is a unique property limitation in this instance as the township zoned this property in the early 1980’s as Residential-2 where only one secondary structure is allowed. The Pauls’ own 6.04 acres in this area and the minimum parcel at that time was one acre. Assuming that the parcels created in this area would be one acre, normally there would not be enough area for a secondary structure. The Paul’s stated that they need to get their collector cars, boat, motorcycle, 2 snowmobiles, plow, 4-wheel ATV under cover and can’t do that with the structures that exist. They stated on their form that no harm would come to the public since they own enough land that most of the neighbors would not see the proposed structure nor would they have to create a new driveway on their property. Pedley stated that no other neighbors were heard from
After hearing the testimony and reviewing the provided information from the petitioner and the zoning office there was a motion made by Moe, seconded by Heims to approve the petition and allow 2 secondary structures on the property with all members voting in favor for the same reasons. Motion carried.
Item # 5 The board heard a petition from Dennis Dosch to request a variance to the required setback of 70 feet to construct an accessory building on a town road to 33 feet; a 37 foot variance in Section 30 of Marshall Township
Discussion: Dosch stated he wants to construct a 32 x 38 garage.
The proposed setting would be 37’ off the road right of way which does not meet
the 70’ setback requirement. Dosch
stated that a garage is a permitted use in his zoning district and because of
problems with the property, he has no other choice as
to its location. The
unique property limitation closeness of his existing septic system and an area
that is a natural drainage way for water coming across
After hearing the testimony and reviewing the provided
information from the petitioner and the zoning office there was a motion made
by Rippchien, seconded by McGlynn to approve the petition to allow a garage to
be built 33 feet from the centerline of
Item # 6 The committee heard a petition from Robert Rizzo to request a variance to the required 35 acres in the Agriculture/Forestry zoning district to 30.6 acres in Section 36 of Willow Township.
Discussion: The Rizzo’s were represented by Tina Marshall of
Marshall Real Estate. She stated the Rizzos
own 243 acres and there is an offer to purchase for Parcel “B” on the plat of survey
provided. Parcel “A” is property owned by the
After hearing the testimony and reviewing the provided
information from the petitioner and the zoning office there was a motion made
by Moe, seconded by Heims to approve the petition to vary the parcel size of
Item # 7 Vodak vs. BOA – Pedley has not heard anything new from corporation counsel. The appeal has to be heard but it may take up to 2-3 years for that to happen.
Item # 8 Term
limits will change to 3 years after the next
Item # 9 Judy Elliott will be coming to the next meeting with a variance request to the distance a dog kennel can be from a neighbor. The zoning committee has issued a conditional use permit for the kennel with one of the conditions being a variance approved.
Item # 10 Motion to by Rippchien, second by McGlynn to adjourn at 1: 44 pm. Motion carried.